Antisemitism in educational settings has emerged as a serious concern, with reports of harassment, exclusion, threats, and the targeting of Jewish students and – in university contexts – organizations such as Hillel International and Chabad. According to American Jewish Committee’s State of Antisemitism in America 2025 Report, 34% of American Jewish college students say they have avoided wearing or displaying items that identify them as Jewish due to fears of antisemitism, and 42% report having experienced antisemitism on campus during their time as students. These findings underscore the need for clear policies, consistent action, and sustained institutional commitment to ensuring that all students can learn and participate fully in student life. While much attention has been paid to antisemitism on college campuses, the issue also impacts K-12 institutions.
The education sector is central to confronting antisemitism because school is a near-universal experience, touching every member of our society. When antisemitism is ignored or misunderstood in schools and universities, it not only harms Jewish students—it undermines the core educational mission of fostering critical thinking, intellectual clarity and rigor, and respect for diverse perspectives. Addressing antisemitism therefore requires both responding to incidents and building environments where Jewish life, history, and identity are understood as integral parts of the broader educational experience.
In 2024, AJC established the Center for Education Advocacy to guide educational institutions toward strengthening policies and practices related to antisemitism. Greater detail can be found on AJC’s Center for Education Advocacy webpage. The Center’s Action Plans offer tailored recommendations for different types of educational institutions. The recommendations offered below are not exhaustive.
Build shared knowledge, clarity, and awareness across the institution.
The Brandeis Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies Antisemitism Research Program applies rigorous, peer-reviewed social science research to understand Jewish student experiences and campus climate at a national scale. Rather than relying on anecdotes or reactive responses, the research uses large comparative datasets, student-centered surveys, and nuanced analysis of identity, belonging, and bias to inform policy and programming. This research can be valuable for all educational institutions examining school culture related to Jewish and other minority students to create more effective, proactive, and credible strategies for supporting students across all communities.
Impactful research, such as RAND’s study on Public School Instruction on the Holocaust and Topics Related to Jewish People, offers critical information about how curriculum about Jews is developed and taught in K-12 spaces. Relying on trusted and responsible curriculum providers that have specific expertise in curriculum about the Jewish people in all its rich diversity and long history, such as Institute for Curriculum Services, ConnectED, Facing History and Ourselves, JIMENA (Jews Indigenous to the Middle East and North Africa), and the Weitzman Museum ensure that education about Jews meets the highest educational standards.
American educators can also utilize resources from abroad. UNESCO—a United Nations agency that promotes international cooperation in education, science, and culture to advance peace and mutual understanding—provides K-12 educators with tools to foster understanding and inclusion. UNESCO’s report: The Representation of Jews, Judaism, and Antisemitism in School Textbooks and Curricula in Europe recommends:
Surveys like UNESCO’s Addressing Antisemitism Through Education: A Survey of Teachers’ Knowledge and Understanding affirm that well-trained teachers are key to helping students recognize bias, develop critical thinking, and build respect for diverse communities.
Act promptly, consistently, and fairly when antisemitism occurs or risks escalate.
Following heightened tensions after the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israelis, Washington University in St. Louis publicly condemned antisemitism, reviewed and enforced campus policies on protests, and facilitated transfers to Wash U. for students from other colleges seeking a safer campus environment.
New York University strengthened its non-discrimination policies to clarify protections against antisemitic harassment, created a Title VI coordinator role to oversee complaints related to shared ancestry discrimination, and expanded mandatory antisemitism education and programming. NYU also updated their official guidance on student conduct to include uses of “Zionism,” under certain conditions, as a term of derision subject to disciplinary consequences.
Reduce long-term risk by strengthening institutional culture and systems.
Stanford University addresses antisemitism through a Jewish Advisory Committee and an Antisemitism, Bias, and Communication Subcommittee, which advise on policies, support Jewish students, and guide initiatives like calendar accommodations and kosher dining to foster inclusion and combat bias.
Vanderbilt has expanded efforts to promote civil discourse and respectful dialogue on campus by updating its freedom of expression and use‑of‑space policies to balance open speech with safety and equitable access, and by supporting programs like Dialogue Vanderbilt, which bring students together across differences to discuss contentious issues constructively rather than through conflict.