In October 2024, the Department of Transportation issued its largest penalty ever, for $4 million, against Lufthansa for discriminating against Jewish passengers who were traveling from New York City through Frankfurt to Budapest in May 2022 1. This historic and important settlement shows the value of federal statutes, including but not limited to Title VI, as a way to protect Jews from discrimination.
Title VI of the U.S. Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin by recipients of federal funds. Federal agencies have the ability to withhold funds should discrimination occur without redress. For example, the Department of Education has the authority and responsibility to take steps, up to and including the withholding of federal funds, if a school does not address an issue of discrimination.
Because Title VI does not bar discrimination on the basis of religion, it has been determined that Jews (and Muslims and Sikhs, for example) are covered when they are targeted because of their religious/ethnic identity. Absent this understanding, Title VI wouldn’t be able to address antisemitism in any form.
In September 2023, the White House announced that eight federal departments would actively use Title VI of the Civil Rights Act as a tool to fight antisemitism. The eight departments are the Departments of Agriculture, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban
These fact sheets 2 clarifying that antisemitic discrimination and bias is included in Title VI were welcome and significant.
In addition to Title VI, there are additional federal statutes that should be highlighted and considered as they specifically state that discrimination based on religion is prohibited.
By compiling various authorities here in this non-exhaustive list, we hope to draw the attention of numerous federal agencies to other authorities that may be available to them. There are more opportunities to prohibit discrimination against Jews than what is in Title VI alone.
Certain statutory provisions apply to all U.S. government programs, and in those instances, all regulatory agencies and cabinet departments are regulated by its provisions.
Other statutory provisions apply to some, but not all, regulatory agencies and cabinet departments. These sometimes sweep more broadly than Title VI and often apply whether or not a person engaged in antisemitic conduct is a recipient of federal funding, some of these authorities also provide for private engagement. For example:
(Note: Title 42 contains many statutes that prohibit religious discrimination in the distribution of social welfare funds.The following are a few representative examples.)
(Note: Title 36, subtitle II, titled “Patriotic and National Organizations,” prohibits many patriotic and national organizations from discriminating on the basis of religion with regard to membership selection and board roles. The following are a few representative examples.)
A final note: This compendium does not address certain additional, potentially important questions, including: (1) whether the statute contains a private right of action that would permit the victim of a violation to seek civil redress; (2) whether establishing a violation of the statute requires proof of discriminatory intent or proof of discriminatory effect; and (3) whether the statute also expressly requires affirmative religious accommodations or exceptions to the discrimination ban. One should bear in mind these open questions when looking to these statutes for guidance.