Antisemitism does not respect borders. It spreads through global networks, fuels extremism, undermines democratic institutions, and threatens the security of Jewish communities and societies worldwide. This Playbook serves as a resource for the thousands of diplomats, foreign officials, and international representatives based in the U.S., helping them understand, respond to, and prevent antisemitism within their own communities and in coordination with U.S. partners.
Diplomats and governments are uniquely positioned to confront this challenge—not only by protecting their own citizens, but by setting international standards, strengthening cooperation, and reinforcing the rule of law across nations.
AJC has long advocated a whole-of-society approach because antisemitism does not exist in isolation—it adapts across institutions, digital spaces, and civic life. The approach is best modeled by the recommendations within the Global Guidelines to Counter Antisemitism, launched in 2024 and supported by over 40 countries, and best implemented by the creation and use of national action plans to combat antisemitism.
The Global Guidelines lay a path for how countries can improve understanding of the problem, respond to it effectively, and prevent antisemitism. Each recommendation is important on its own, and together can form the basis for a strong national action plan. (Recommendations below are taken verbatim from the Global Guidelines. Any additional suggestions are italicized.)
National action plans lay a foundation for sustained progress. By committing to clear understanding, balanced public engagement, and sustained investment in prevention, governments can move from aspiration to impact—building societies that are safer, more inclusive, and resilient against hatred.
Understanding antisemitism is a core responsibility of governments and diplomats, because effective policy and good governance depend on accurately recognizing how antisemitism operates across ideologies and institutions.
The OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights approach treats antisemitism data not as a simple count of incidents but as a full accountability system: it standardizes definitions (often aligned with International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance), integrates multiple data sources (police, courts, and civil society), tracks cases through the entire justice chain, and builds in transparency and regular reporting. Crucially, it also accounts for underreporting and relies on trained frontline actors, turning data into a tool for real-time policy decisions, resource allocation, and institutional accountability, rather than a passive record of events.
Responding to antisemitism requires visible leadership, consistent enforcement of the law, and coordinated action across governments and international partners.
Public condemnation matters. Leaders calling out antisemitism pushes back against the normalization of hate, reinforces trust, and can spark action.
Effective condemnation hinges on:
Condemnation efforts are weakened when they:
Prevention is the most effective form of protection, requiring governments to invest in education, security, and international cooperation to stop threats before they escalate and to strengthen institutions that protect all communities.
Germany implements its national action plan through a Federal Commissioner for Jewish Life and the Fight Against Antisemitism, with additional commissioners appointed by the states, supported by cross-government coordination.
The following are meaningful, measurable steps government ministries can take to counter antisemitism: